search for


Stabilizing Periodontally Compromized Teeth with Polyethylene Fibre Splint: A Case Report
Int J Clin Prev Dent 2015;11(2):125-127
Published online June 30, 2015;
© 2015 Korean Academy of Preventive Dentistry.

Ruchi Singla1, Rahul Grover2

1Dr HSJ Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 2Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research, Faridabad, India
Correspondence to: Ruchi Singla
Dr HSJ Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Punjab University, Vidya Path, Sector 25, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
Tel: +91-9915772837, Fax: +91-1722693987, E-mail:
Received November 4, 2013; Revised June 18, 2015; Accepted June 30, 2015.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The aim of this article is to present a case of splinting periodontally compromised mandibular right anterior teeth with polyethylene fibre reinforced composite splint-ribbond. A 34-year-old male with Grade II mobile mandibular right anterior teeth splinted with ribbond. Different materials have been successfully used for splinting which include-composite, wire and composite and fibre reinforced splints. In order to fulfill both the periodontal and restorative needs, ribbons and fibers were developed that could be reinforced with composite resin to form thin-but-strong splints. These splints are more stable and durable than the approaches of splinting used in the past.
Keywords : polyethylene, ribbond, splints, tooth mobility
  1. Hallmon WW, Carranza FA, Drisko CL. Periodontal literature reviews: a summary of current knowledge. 8th ed. Chicago, IL:American Academy of Periodontology; 1996.
  2. Bernal G, Carvajal JC, Mu?oz-Viveros CA. A review of the clinical management of mobile teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2002;3:10-22.
  3. Kau K, Rudo DN. A technique for fabricating a reinforced composite splint. Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab 1992;9:31-3.
  4. Omid T, Venus MM, Farahnaz S, Asghar AA. Effect of glass fiber length on flexural strength of fiber-reinforced composite resin. World J Dent 2012;3:131-5.
  5. Gordon JE. Structures or why things don’t fall down. The mysteries of shear and torsion. 1st ed. England: Penguin Group Publishing; 1978:243-71.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Samadzadeh A, Kugel G, Hurley E, Aboushala A. Fracture strengths of provisional restorations reinforced with plasmatreated woven polyethylene fiber. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:447-50.
  7. Wheeler TT, McArthur WP, Magnusson I, Marks RG, Smith J, Sarrett DC, et al. Modeling the relationship between clinical, microbiologic, and immunologic parameters and alveolar bone levels in an elderly population. J Periodontol 1994;65:68-78.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. McGuire MK, Nunn ME. Prognosis versus actual outcome. III. The effectiveness of clinical parameters in accurately predicting tooth survival. J Periodontol 1996;67:666-74.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Karbhari VM, Dolgopolsky A. Transitions between micro-brittle and micro-ductile material behaviour during FCP in short-fibre reinforced composites. Int J Fatigue 1990;12:51-61.
  10. Karaman AI, Kir N, Belli S. Four applications of reinforced polyethylene fiber material in orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:650-4.
    Pubmed CrossRef

December 2017, 13 (4)